NALA Certified Paralegal Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Master the NALA Certified Paralegal Exam with our comprehensive practice quiz. Tailored to mirror the real test, it's the perfect tool to assess your readiness, boost your confidence, and enhance your study strategy

Start Multiple Choice Practice Test
Start Flash Cards

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

A voir dire challenge to exclude a potential juror which requires that counsel supply a supporting reason or cause is called:

  1. A challenge

  2. A challenge for cause

  3. A peremptory challenge

  4. An objection

The correct answer is: A challenge for cause

A challenge for cause requires that counsel must give a valid reason or explanation for why a potential juror should be excluded. This is different from a peremptory challenge, which does not require a specific justification and can be used for any reason or no reason at all. An objection is a formal statement of disagreement with a ruling or procedure, but it is not the same as a challenge for cause. While all of these options involve challenging a potential juror, only option B specifically refers to the requirement of providing a supporting reason or cause.

More Questions Like This